torok said:
About Metas, I think critics are crazy. Almost all games got low scores this year. For me, critics are only distributing bad scores to look like they have high standards when they surelly don't have. GT6 is a complete game on an old platform, so they didn't like. F5 lacks some content on a new platform, so they didn't like. They wanted a complete and full featured complete simulation racing game in the first year? GT3 has a good metascore and launched early on PS2 gen but with less than 200 cars, the lowest car count GT ever had, so its a very similar situation to Forza. |
It just seems like console war propaganda to me. Ive said it before but if these games werent exclusive we prob wouldnt be having threads like these and people would just enjoy the games instead -_-
i think there was some websites doing trollish reviews to make one or the other look better but besides Killer Instinct I pretty much agree with most of the scores. I havent played Killzone but I have a feeling i prob wouldnt agree with it since the multiplayer looks great.
I havent played GT6 but Forza 5 is the best racer Ive played in years. That includes past forza games, GT5, Need for Speed games, Shift, Burnout, Grid, etc (Not including kart racers). However Forza is lacking content regardless of how good the game is from a gameplay standpoint and i wish they would have included Auction House so i would score it lower than past forza games as well. I'd prob give Forza 5 a 8.5 or something around that area which is pretty close to the meta. GT6 Im sure is good as well so people should just enjoy it.
