Nem said:
drake4 said:
Nem said:
Weak hardware? They both ran on the same hardware.
Of course, if you compare it to 2 generations down the line the new one looks better, but you dont have a brand new cell-shaded Zelda in the same line to compare to. But you already proved the point by saying that you need to move 2 generations ahead to get something better looking. ^^
|
except that the wii wasn't a generation ahead of gamecube graphically, the wii U is, and once again your forgetting cartoony graphics are much easier to achieve, for instant super nes /genesis games look better then most ps and n64 games, you're comparing apples to oranges. street fight third strike looks better to me then the street fighter 4 series.
|
I dunno if they are easier to achieve. Nor do you. Only a graphics programmer would know.
I'm not comparing apples with oranges. My original point wich you tried to refute is that art is more important in achieving good graphics than polly count.
|
the proof is right in front you, wind waker, conkers live and reloaded and mario galaxy 1 and 2, even though these games are on hardware thta came out 12 years ago they still look good, better then most platformers out today, while realistic games from that era look like crap now
