By using this site, you agree to our Privacy Policy and our Terms of Use. Close
Nem said:
drake4 said:
Nem said:
 


Its ok, im not a lamb with the herd. I dont need legitimicy from others to be able to tell what is good and what isnt.

Though i challenge you to look at Zelda the Wind waker and compare it to say... Twilight princess and tell me that looks better.

yea wind waker looks better becuase zeldaTP ran on weak hardware that could not do it justice, now look the zelda tech demo for wiiu, makes wind waker look like shiq to me.


Weak hardware? They both ran on the same hardware.

Of course, if you compare it to 2 generations down the line the new one looks better, but you dont have a brand new cell-shaded Zelda in the same line to compare to. But you already proved the point by saying that you need to move 2 generations ahead to get something better looking. ^^

except that the wii wasn't a generation ahead of gamecube graphically, the wii U is, and once again your forgetting cartoony graphics are much easier to achieve, for instant super nes /genesis games look better then most ps and n64 games, you're comparing apples to oranges. street fight third strike looks better to me then the street fighter 4 series.