Nem said:
drake4 said:
Nem said:
Indeed, we reached such a level of fidelity that a good art design can outshine fancy realistic graphics. With that said, the most impressive things i saw were X, The witcher 3 and the division. But only X excites me cause i know theres a genuinely good game behind it (i trust monolith). The Witcher, i doubt projectred will fix the boring combat system cause they seem to be focusing so much on graphics and the division looks nice but i doubt its a very good game.
I guess graphics alone are not enough to excite me anymore.
|
not really, that's only your opinion, looking at sales, fancy realistic graphics is what people want, the division, witcher 3 and battle field 4, look a million times better to me then mario 3d world or X, mario world in particuler looks so simple, the only thing i can say about is 60fps and colorful, it's a little more detailed then the galaxy series, just mainly has better textures , effects and lighting, we have platformers on 360/ps3 that look much better way with way more detail, it's just they don't run at 30fps.
|
Its ok, im not a lamb with the herd. I dont need legitimicy from others to be able to tell what is good and what isnt.
Though i challenge you to look at Zelda the Wind waker and compare it to say... Twilight princess and tell me that looks better.
|
yea wind waker looks better becuase zeldaTP ran on weak hardware that could not do it justice, now look the zelda tech demo for wiiu, makes wind waker look like shiq to me.