By using this site, you agree to our Privacy Policy and our Terms of Use. Close
Seece on 13 December 2013
Edit Thread
osed125 said:
Seece said:

Nope, still an incredibly weak argument. You can't claim they're twins just because they get third party games (and I bet bottom dollar if WiiU got all those third party games you wouldn't be calling them them the HD triplets.)

I suggest you go play an Xbox One and PS4 and you'll see they do things very differently, Xbox One is very focused on Kinect, whereas PS4 is focusing on Vita as an input device.

His point is very clear I think. Unless you want MS or Sony exclusives very badly you can basically choose between either one of them, what drives those consoles up are the 3rd party games, and both of them will have the exact same libabry when it comes to 3rd party stuff. 

Price, off-game features, graphics, etc will be the reason most people will make a choice between the PS4 and X1, and not the difference between libraries.

Edit: Nintendo case is different because every since the N64 what drives the console are 1st party games, very different from MS and Sony.

Again disagree, this is a roundabout way of saying Nintendo first party is better than MS and Sony, which is subjective at least to the point where one isn't massively ahead of the other. In fact, if you buy a PS4 say, you're more likely to be interested in XB1 exclusives than WiiU exclusives. Why would that person buy a WiiU for its exclusives, but not an Xbox One??