Should probability invalidate responsibility?

[YouKnow]

Ponyless said:

ps3-sales! said:

Jay520 said:

ps3-sales! said:

This is possibly the great console failure anolagy I've ever seen. Bravo to you sir.

You bring up a great point. By logic alone, probability should not affect accountability. Unfortunately, especially for most electronics, small failure rate is universally accepted as the norm. Should it be accepted? No. But, nonetheless the consumer does accept it.

Actually, this wasn't meant to be an analogy for electronics. It involves something else, something we may or may not agree with. I haven't seen enough of your posts, but I'm going to assume you would disagree with me since most men probably do.

What if I were to say I'm not a man?

But seriously tell me. My curiousity is literally exploding right now.

If you're fucking a girl and the condom breaks, even though there was only a 1 percent chance of it breaking, should you still be held accountable for the child if the woman chooses not to get an abortion? That was his point.

If this truly was his point, then the analogy is inaccurate.

You took necessary precaution to avoid impregnating the female in the form of the condom. The baker takes no precautions at all. He simply spews his seed and hopes for the best.