rakugakist on 08 December 2013
| NotStan said: Honestly, this is rewarding stupidity, a refund was going too far, especially if it clearly stated that it was a picture. The worst thing is he was 15-16 when he had his son, so the genius will spread further. Am not slagging off early parents, my mother had me when she was 19, but honestly, that's just outrageous, there are worse things that happened before and they don't come with so much more on top. Stupidity should NOT be rewarded. |
I don't even think he could have been 16 when he had his son. If so, and his son was four, wouldn't that make him 20? I agree with you completely though. This type of idiocy should not be promoted with rewards.
