padib said:
It's an interesting way to look at it, but wouldn't that be more of a loan than a gift? A man gives his sperm in unprotected sex under the understanding that it will be used for procreation. Otherwise, like you said they'd have used contraception. |
I don't know if I would call it a "loan" or a "gift."
Anyway, when a man has unprotected sex, he places the control of his sperm in full control of the woman. Sure, he may expect the woman to use the sperm to make a baby, but I don't believe she has any moral obligation to do so.