| KylieDog said:
@bolded, Is like you cannot even read. I already shot down that flawed argument. |
Yeah you did and I remember reading that too, just for some reason seemed to ignore it when typing my reply, sorry. I still think it stands though, if someone doesn't enjoy the game enough to keep it, you think they'll play those 50 hrs at all? 8 hrs is more likely, leaving 42 hours for the new owner. I understand the reasoning behind charging for online passes but don't agree with them as they are just punishments for legitmate gamers while the real reason they are exist are because of pirates.
The intergration was not free. You think all the development of the system, the ability to upload to existing social media outlets and Live Streaming cost nothing?All require some kind of input and development. Sadly the industry is no longer a 'buy console and play' industry. There are many things to consider.
It's strange to think that your first post was saying that it costs money to run servers, then you say this should be in the cost of games, yet an online pass isn't in the cost of the game, it's extra (if you buy it) and PSN and Xbox Live are run by servers, yet we don't buy games to pay for this. Although countering my own arguement, we buy the system and guy digital games from the stores, this should pay for the costs of running the servers.
But lets not get this wrong, I understand why they charge but entirely disagree with paying to play games online, I certainly won't be paying any time soon. It's a joke of an idea that has somehow stuck.
Hmm, pie.







