fatslob-:O said:
Excuse ?! If Beyond3D deems you as unworthy then I have nothing more to say. Cry all you want about Beyond3D being anti nintendo but that doesn't change the fact that their PC dominated. They obviously hate all consoles including nintendo so I don't see your point. Everyone came attacking because you were obviously ignorant on the subject. You likely got called out by exophase much like how eyeofcore did when he was at anandtech. It's over, your unworthy to speak about the subjects of high technology much like how eyeofcore is unworthy to do the same. |
you are right, is over
wii u is at least 500 gigaflops and can be proven in any ways despite what must byond3d mebers say(i say must but not all sicne tehre are still few who defend it)
1.- wii u gpu die size even without edram is enough to fit a redwood xt which packs 400spus, 20 tmus and 8 rops, so depending on what priority nintendo opted for, the power could be between 450 and 500 gigaflops as i doubt nintendo opted for to many tmus
2.-wii u power consumption is more than 63 wattts and has been confrimed officialy by the department of energy of usa, current ports only use 33 watts and is enough for them to work on wii u, so, even if i account the 4 usbs and the sdhc, thats only about 10.72 watts, so there would still be like 20 watts left for gaming that havent been used
lets say that 15 of those go for the gpu since tjhe ddr3 only wopuld cosnjme like 1.65 watts, the edram just consumes some miliwats and the cpu cores wouldnt be consuming more than 1.6 watts since the gamecube cpu only consumed about 4.9 watts at 180nm at 485mhz, even if heavely customized and wioth the extra clock speed, we are talking about a shrinking to 45nm, just for example, look how much the 476fp consumes?, only 1.6 watts per core at 1.6ghz, and the wii u is 1.24gjhz
think that 15 watts dont matte?
well, the e6760 gpu for example has a performance of 16.5gigaflops per watt, just do the math and you get about 247gigaflops that current ports are not taking profit on