By using this site, you agree to our Privacy Policy and our Terms of Use. Close
Colltrain said:
Panicnausia said:
Colltrain said:
Panicnausia said:
selnor1983 said:
Panicnausia said:

Majority???? Where? Digital foundry disagrees. The tech proof is in the pudding, Ryse would gave ran at 1080P on ps4.

No DF said in the technical analysis Ryse over everything at launch. Wat your refferring to on Neogaf was the writer saying he prefferred the Aesthetic of KZ SF. Artstyle to help you understand. He confirms that when questioned. 

His Gaf orum posting your trying to cling to is him outside of DF. His DF article is his job. Dont confuse the 2. DF say Ryse > KZ. But Im suree youll cling to  what you can.

Ryse is better in all categories. KZ animation is pretty bad actually as is the texture detail in comparison to Ryse. 


Agin lies... They sasid technically KZ is the best launch title period... Even if they are tied KZ is way more impressive as ryse struggles to maintain a Frame rate over 25, is 900 p and is very limited.

That said, if you really want a taste of what we can expect from the next generation of consoles, Ryse towers over the rest.- Quoted from Digital foundry...................Sorry please say what was lies?

Looks like someone missed the KZ analysis AFTEr they played ryse where they state "KZ is the most technically impressive lauhc game:.

Didn't miss anything! You said LIES and well turns out this is the Digital Foundry impression of the game.........Was something not clear from this??

The goalposts are moved frequently from the Trolls to suit needs and it is rather pathetic, examples - Ryse is 900p and 20 frames, Ryse is linear and baked, reviewers LIED, People who actually played the game are blind ETC ETC. 

Thankyou. 

I repeat, DF's analysis concluded KZ is the best launch game..nothing you say changes that... On top of that it is higher resolution higher framerate and is not on rails or limited in scope like ryse.