how is this review unbiased in any way?
he makes judgements based on his personal preferences, and choses to compare it with games which he selectively picks. he also uses terms such as "boring" and seems to have formed his own criteria on what make a character "flawless".
what he called boring may be fun to someone else. what he called shallow may still be a great experience for someone else.
I thought by unbiased review, it was going to be highly technical and explain its advantages and disadvantages quantitatively, but this is just like any other review.
In an unbiased review, you only state facts about the game that help the reader decide whether they like it or not. Talking about your perception of the game is the definition of bias.