By using this site, you agree to our Privacy Policy and our Terms of Use. Close
Panicnausia on 29 November 2013
Edit Thread
the-pi-guy said:
Panicnausia said:
shikamaru317 said:

Sorry, if my original comment was misinterpreted. When I said that developers who learned how to properly utilize the ESRAM and tiled resources would release better looking Xbox One versions of multiplat game, I didn't mean that the Xbox One versions of those games would look better than the PS4 versions, but rather that those developers will release Xbox One and PS4 versions that look more similar than we've seen so far (big resolution differences). 

You're right, memory bandwidth is not the Xbox One's main issue. I've read Xbox One breakdown analyses from various tech sites, and most agree that the ESRAM+DDR3 setup of the Xbox One isn't going to hold most games back, it's simply the fact that the GPU is a good bit weaker. That being said, the Xbox One has a slightly more powerful CPU, meaning that the Xbox One could potentially close the gap on CPU bound games. 

Slightly more powerfull cpu??? How? That's simply false.

Are you a dev?

Sony hasn't given an official clockrate.  MS assumed that they had an advantage, 1.75 vs 1.6.  Though there was that one report that it was actually 1.8 vs 1.75.

So I think Sony might have the advantage.  

Otherwise I was under the impression that the CPU was basically identical aside from the clock rate.  

Are you?? Saying it's slightly weaker when we have no proof is false..period.