DonFerrari on 28 November 2013
| Puppyroach said: I really always go for the underdog from the beginning, you know, the "new" kid on the block. Sega had that position in the late 80´s, trying to break into Nintendo´s domination at the time. Same with MS and the original Xbox where they tried to make a dent in Sony´s enormous succes. I belive it is thanks to these newcomers that the established companies really need to up their game. So I have no problem with Sony fans thanking MS for them having a better product than what they otherwise would have :). |
It seems you didn't cheered Sony when they entered the fray, whys is that??
I could survive in a world of Nintendo monopoly, have lived in a world of Sony monopoly and been happy... anything MS have monopoly I always have the sensation I'm being screwed (just like with OS).
duduspace11 "Well, since we are estimating costs, Pokemon Red/Blue did cost Nintendo about $50m to make back in 1996"
http://gamrconnect.vgchartz.com/post.php?id=8808363
Mr Puggsly: "Hehe, I said good profit. You said big profit. Frankly, not losing money is what I meant by good. Don't get hung up on semantics"
http://gamrconnect.vgchartz.com/post.php?id=9008994
Azzanation: "PS5 wouldn't sold out at launch without scalpers."
