| mmnin said: As far as scientists being apprehensive toward ID, have you ever considered that the tables have turned and people who believe in ID might be the Galileo or Columbus of today? |
That is insanity. The entire difference between ID and scientists is the quest for knowledge.
Scientists are constantly testing, checking, and changing their opinions on various matters. Believers in ID still hold fast and true to a book that was written when the scientific community still believed that mice spawned from rotten fruit like maggots.
One has shown a bit of progress over the past 1500 years. The other still holds true to that 1500 year old book.
Comparing a man like Galileo or Columbus (seriously, did he really even do anything?) to ID supporters is not only insulting, but patently false.
Or check out my new webcomic: http://selfcentent.com/
