Final-Fan said:
Coca-Cola said:
I just read wikipedia - it's pretty predictable - people who are against creationism will hate the film and Christians and other creationist will love it. Thought it was interesting that they note the fact that there is a difference between intelligent design and creationism. I guess the movie is not about creationism but more for intelligent design.
A reporter named Moore saw the movie, sneaking into the screening impersonating a minister. haha
"The producers have since issued an "online media alert" lambasting the professional film critic for criticising the movie. They characterise Moore's review as a "security breech [sic]" and claim that Moore gained entry by impersonating a minister. In response to Moore's charge that the film's manipulation of Holocaust imagery is "despicable", Stein states that "The only thing I find despicable is when reporters sneak into screenings by pretending to be ministers. This is a new low even for liberal reporters." |
Wikipedia lists dozens of objections to the accuracy, methodology, and tactics of the documentary makers, and your objections are:
1. LOL they hate us
2. reporter snuck in
I think we can see that you have no actual ability to refute the allegations of the Wikipedia article. I'm not taking their word as Gospel, but if even a fifth of the crap in there is true that documentary is trash. |
If the movie is as bad as they claim we should be able to refute it based on our own knowledge or at worst with minor research. I don't fear a different opinion so much that I would condemn it before hearing it based soley on the opinion of someone..or even several someones. Especially if those people were people I didn't even know personally.
Thats the tact I try to take on these things anyways...not that I always succeed but I try~
