rocketpig said:
The printing press is an invention, not science. My statement still holds true about Medieval times. Take astronomy, for example. Huge advances were made during Roman times and then very little happened until the Renaissance and Copernicus. The Medieval period was a black hole for the scientific community. The Spanish Inquisition may not have been ordered by the Pope, but that's not what you said in your OP. You mentioned "the pope or anyone else" in reference to religious figures. The Spanish Inquisition was fueled by religious figures, was it not? Did they not constrain scientific figures and ban scientific texts? When I reference "true science", I mean science unhindered by outside influences. If science was contrained by religion during Medieval times, it's hard to consider it "true science". Even many of the Renaissance scientific discoveries were hindered and challenged by a powerful religious state. It's only been in the last two centuries that we have seen a scientific community fueled by their own will and desire for knowledge. Sure, you can use video games as reference but that doesn't mean it's correct, especially when you use it to try to prove that most scientific advancements happen during wartime. It's akin to using the movie The Day After Tomorrow to prove the science behind global warming. |
It not even that scientific progress was slowed or stopped during medieval times. Its that we went backwards hundreds of years. The Greeks and Romans were far more advanced civilizations than anything up until the Renaissance. We lost alot of knowledge during this time period. Religion played a central role in this process.







