selnor1983 said:
Aldro said:
selnor1983 said:
bananaking21 said:
selnor1983 said:
bananaking21 said:
selnor1983 said:
I only posted Darks comments. I have never once quoted anyone else. Read the thread. They are all his posts. Jesus Christ. Your trying to cherrypick Artstyle here now as technical analysis? Like I said theres more to come from him. They are chewing him up and spitting him out. They are again asking about the Ryse comment being better than all other launch games. Awaiting another reply.
Poor guy shuldnt have tried to keep fanboys happy. LOL.
|
according to this comment you killed any credibility the guys has for making a objective judgment about which game looks better. if he does make these calls to make fanboys happy then he doesnt make them based on the truth and on what game looks better. therefor his objectove opinion is invalid according to you. so when he does say ryse is the best looking game (which he doesnt btw) but even if he did, it doesnt matter, because he just said it to make fanboys happy. so you taking his words doesnt mean shit, because you just questions his credibility. congrats, you just shot down your own argument and have no legs to stand on what so ever to claim that ryse is the best looking game between the two.
|
He does say Ryse. In the official article posted on DF.
But after being attacked by fans he said Killzone. Then later reveals he Artistically prefers Killzone.
The debate between him and them is not over yet. Waiting on his reply.
|
but he only makes his discisions to please fanboys. thats what YOU said. so it doesnt matter now, does it?
dude you killed your own argument, give it a rest.
|
I was talking about the thread on gaf. As far as Im aware the Articles on DF are a Technical analysis. Whereas in the forum he gives alot of opinion and aethestic reasons.
|
Are you serious? What about the talk about Ryse being a boring game he cannot recommend to others? That isn't opinion based? It's in the same article you seem to weigh so heavily lmao.
|
Im talking about its technical analysis. I was under the impression DF vs is always a technical analysis of the game engine and its visuals. Its not a review is it?
|
I don't know about you, but when someone closes a "technical analysis" with this:
"However, despite all the technological finery on offer, the limited and repetitive gameplay make Ryse difficult to actually recommend as a prospective purchase. That said, if you really want a taste of what we can expect from the next generation of consoles, Ryse towers over the rest."
It generally comes across as more or less an opinion based article. (That's not to take away anything from the analysis parts because they are obviously there).
But his comment on GAF was that he could see both at the top. And aestethics don't do that alone. The technology of both is more or less even. But the only reason he states Killzone has the nod is probably mostly due to the aesthetics. One has to atleast assume they are tied somewhat. (Which once again is odd since Ryse is less open).
And we still have the "VS Shadow Fall" article to go. I don't think he's going to post in that GAF thread really. It seems pretty dead.
