By using this site, you agree to our Privacy Policy and our Terms of Use. Close
Train wreck said:
Mr Khan said:
Train wreck said:
Don't know why people are arguing with folks over the wii U getting positive news, just let them bask in the glow and have them overhype this news. If consumers cared about the Wii U they would have bought it in droves over the course of this prior year. Its not like they don't know new Nintendo games are coming. I'm guessing the payola that Nintendo sent out to the multiple publications this past week are for former Wii owners who have neglected the system (and even after the press will continue to do so) to take a second look.

payola?

 

Payola, in the American music industry, is the illegal practice of payment or other inducement by record companies for the broadcast of recordings on music radio in which the song is presented as being part of the normal day's broadcast. Under U.S. law, 47 U.S.C. § 317, a radio station can play a specific song in exchange for money, but this must be disclosed on the air as being sponsored airtime, and that play of the song should not be counted as a "regular airplay".

The term has come to refer to any secret payment made to cast a product in a favorable light (such as obtaining positive reviews).

Some radio stations report spins of the newest and most popular songs to industry publications. The number of times the songs are played can influence the perceived popularity of a song.

The term payola is likely a portmanteau, of the words “pay” and either Pianola (a once-common name for player pianos), or “Victrola”, trade name of the widely known early phonographs made by RCA Victor.[1] Payola has come to mean the payment of a bribe in commerce and in law to say or do a certain thing against the rules of law, but more specifically a commercial bribe. The FCC defines "payola" as a violation of the sponsorship identification rule that in 2005-06 resulted in tens of millions of dollars in fines to cable

--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

Its what polygon is accused of when it comes to favorable Xbox and less favorable Playstation reviews.  Dont know if payment was involved (most likely not), I just believe this sudden message change (especially from CNET) was orchastred from NOA.

I know full well what payola is. I'm just wondering why positive Nintendo news from media outlets has to be payola. Seems a bit of a reach, to me.

The CNET thing was likely the opinions of different editors. The "tech gifts" one made sense if you're thinking just in terms of getting the best "tech" for the holiday season (for someone interested in the nuts and bolts of it, yeah, Wii U is a bad idea compared to the others). A media outlet shouldn't be expected to have one unified voice, especially when it may have different columns that appeal to different interests as in the case of a very large, prominent outlet like CNET, which could lead to conflicting evaluations of the same product without a guy in a Link costume having to fly in from Redmond with a sack of Ruppees (though not actual Ruppees. My god what happened to the exchange rate on those things...)



Monster Hunter: pissing me off since 2010.