DonFerrari on 25 November 2013
Kane1389 said:
DonFerrari said:
Kane1389 said:
curl-6 said:
kupomogli said:
ninetailschris said:
kupomogli said:
Mensrea said:
Next gen graphics don't suck. :)
|
Use first party Nintendo games that aren't X and you may as well be showing pictures off that are marginably better than what the Wii can handle, just in HD.
|
You're delusional. I'm sorry there is no way could that never play on the wii at 20 fps let alone 60. The lighting and poly alone make this crazy. Sd to Hd is huge.
|
Except I never said it could play on the Wii, and I did mention the HD. Here's what I mean about marginably better. If the PS2 HD Collections were slightly touched up to look slightly better. So HD and looks a little better, but hardly much of a jump.
Infamous Second Son looks like it's more of a jump between any PS3 game than any Mario game is to the first Super Mario Galaxy.
|
I dunno, I'd say that the leap from Mario 64 to Mario Galaxy absolutely dwarfs the leap from Infamous 1 or 2 to Infamous Second Son.
|
So now you've resorted to comparing jumps between 2 generatios instead of 1 to make Nintendo graphics more impressive?
|
That is because N64 to WiiU they are considering that Nintendo improved as much as Sony from PS3 to PS4, understand?
|
No, no I don't understand what you are saying?
|
GC+Wii doesn't count as generational leaps... its like they gone from N64 to WiiU that is why he can pick games that far apart.. finally some Nintendo fans agree that the hardware is weak.