Smidlee said:
As I have no problem with people who believes in the mythical creature that supposed to have been the anestor of both ape and man. As the writer in my article points out often believing is seeing even with evolutionists. I do try to understand why Darwinist believes what they do and sometimes they make give reasons to believe what they do. Also just because I have faith doesn't mean there isn't any sound evidence or reason behind my faith. True Faith is never alone. |
There is ample evidence of a man-like creature that preceded homo sapien, we just haven't found the entirety of the links that lead back to an ape-like creature (but we have found several). That's not surprising given the extreme rarity of fossilized creatures and the specific situations that cause longterm preservation to occur. You're throwing out the baby with the bath water. There is plenty of evidence of evolution without bringing man in the equation.
BTW, I would love to see some of this sound evidence of your faith (at least you call it that).

Or check out my new webcomic: http://selfcentent.com/







