selnor1983 said:
No, dont bite. Im not spitting on Nintendo. I grew up with Nintendo. I loved them. So much I spent 2 years at 9 years old cutting up magazines and covered my entire bedroom in characters and screenshots of games from Nintendo. I was the BIGGEST fanboy of Nintendo I knew. Nintendo were once ALL about Graphics and power. Us Nintendo fans of really old loved this. We knew buying Snes it had mode 7. It was cutting edge but had awesome games to go with it. When N64 was releasing, I knew I was getting cutting edge. OOT impressed with its wide open vistas in Hyrule as much as the gameplay. With GC we were shown an awesome bit of Zelda footage before GC released of Link fighting Gannon. It looked amazing at the time, and had us drooling. Until it turned into WW and we got this cell shaded what? Not what I was hopng for, and the turning point in my book when Nintendo started to say its not about power but gameplay. They left gamers like me who loved power just as much as gameplay. Why couldnt Nintendo incorporate both? It was Nintendo that lost my money, not Microsoft who stole me. |
No, no, I didn't mean biting like that. I meant I would bite at the hook you were dangling :)
If you're interested in horsepower then I understand your decision to move away from Nintendo. But why in 2003? The differences in the SpaceWorld demo and the final product, i.e., Wind Waker, are mostly artistic, not technical. If anything, Wind Waker is more impressive technically than a tech demo from 2000. Seems like a strange time to jump ship.