SocialistSlayer said:
J_Allard said:
SocialistSlayer said:
you dont know when either game started development, so i dont know how you can claim which game has been in development longer to be fact.
and we dont know the framerate of Driveclub. last i heard the devs said they were targetting 60fps. it looks like they wouldnt have hit that if they released at launch, but with the couple month delay i wouldnt be surprissed if it gets bumbed up to 60fps.
as for the bolded. that would be akin to saying if Tomb Raider Doesnt look better than Uncharted 3 because it came out 6 months after it, it would be a joke. after all its the same genre and had longer dev time. fact.
sounds like damage control to me.
|
lolololololo @ calling it damage control in the same reply where you say you wouldn't be surprised if a couple months delay could result in a bump from 30 to 60 frames per second. All you did with that comment was prove my point for me, so thanks.
Also, nowhere in any of these posts did I say a word about development times. I said one game had to meet a launch deadline and the other did not. This factual claim you're going on about, idk what you're talking about. You seem as confused as the last guy who replied.
The Tomb Raider example is crap because that's a 3rd party MP game and there is no huge frame rate difference between the two. Also, neither were launch games. So I get to open and close the reply with a good laugh. Thanks. Last reply I will make to this thread.
|
are you trolling right now? you must have some serious congnitive dissonance to actually believe what your saying.
|
It's ok now. He left. You get to have the last laugh. xD
