By using this site, you agree to our Privacy Policy and our Terms of Use. Close
mmnin said:
Rath said:
mmnin said:
have you "seen" this process happen rocketpig? other than "it makes sense in theory with associative evidence."

Have you seen the movement of tectonic plates mmnin? other than "it makes sense in theory with associative evidence."

 

Things that take a long time are observed through long term predictions and through looking at past evidence. Evolution hardly happens overnight and only ever happens on a mass and fast scale after massive extinctions. Which happily humans look to be causing sometime in the next couple of hundred years, maybe we will be observing evolution sooner than we'd like.

 


What we know as fact is what we have seen to be true. Believe in God or not, that is an argument written off because the multiple other possibilities mixed with masses not experiencing God lead the populus against it. However, if you cannot see evolution because it does take a long time, or rather a rare occurence over a short time, to show true, then isn't that just as not seeing God? Claiming Evolution in its extreme form as anything more than a theory is just as ignorant a stance. With as much as we have yet to learn, is there not any possibilities that could have existed in our past, unobserved and unrealized, that could lay way to much that we see used today in support of evolution, though falsely so?


One relies on faith in a book written centuries ago while the other is a constantly-changing theory backed by more and more evidence every day.

I can show you evidence of evolution and solid theories to back it up. I challenge you to do the same with God.




Or check out my new webcomic: http://selfcentent.com/