GotchayeA on 07 March 2008
Bursche, first, what Rath said. Second, look up "Pascal's Wager" - your argument makes no sense. Third, mainstream biology largely ignores the existence of the ID movement - there's just nothing of substance there to talk about. It's the ID movement that obsesses about proving evolution wrong. Look at arguments for evolution, and you'll only see passing mentions of ID, if that. Look at arguments for ID, and you'll have a hard time telling whether or not you're reading positive arguments for ID or purely negative arguments against evolution.
Smidlee, honestly. Nice cheap, irrelevant shot.
