| megafenix said: this tell me you dont get the point i am basically saying that since the gpus have internal caches of just some kilobytes shouldnt the 32megabytes of edram be considered like a ra for the gpu? not saying is a real ram, is just an analogy dude seriously, you lack of undesrtanding is awful and now i have already proven to you that cache for gpu is more in the line of kilobytes and not megabytes just look at how much youy got for texture units spus and other stuff only 8 kilobytes of texture cache only 64kilobytes of global data share about 8 to 16 kilobyte of local data share
can you copare that to 32megabytes? no sorry dude, no atter what you say all people here have watched your previous staetents |
Again get this through your thick skull. There exists CACHE HIERACHERIES, your excuses as to why caches should be in kilobytes and not megabytes is completely stupid.
Whether the cache is in megabytes or kilobytes does not matter because what's defining about the cache is the ACCESS TIMES. Again fraud, why does the intel iris pro treat it's eDRAM as an L4 cache ?
It's not ram because it has a much faster access times than the main memory.
