windbane on 07 March 2008
| Onyxmeth said: I can see both sides of the argument here. If Metal Gear Solid 3: Snake Eater and Metal Gear Solid 3: Subsistence were both announced before either were released and everyone knew there would be a 7 month gap between them, a lot of people would want to wait it out for the complete version instead of opting for the gimped version. Some people would just need their MGS3 experience then and there and wouldn't be able to wait, so would probably make a double purchase. I'm the kind of person that would wait, but I'm starting to understand those that can't. I still find it rotten that Sony won't pull a fan friendly move and allow GT5 Prologue buyers to upgrade to GT5 through DLC for $20 or at all. |
Except in a 1up show it was mentioned that it's likely that the new features for the full game will be a downloadable option so it won't be another $60. GT5:Pro is already a downloadable game as well as retail so there's a good chance of the rest being downloadable.
Oh, and if MGS3 original come out and the other version didn't come out until possibly a year later, then yes, I would buy it.
Personally, I'm going to rent it, but I've never played GT before. I think for those that like it, it's a great deal.
As for the 6 tracks thing people are arguing about: Motorstorm's tracks were different for the different vehicles so that was worth a full game. 6 tracks is worth 40 with all the online and tuning and split screen etc.
