By using this site, you agree to our Privacy Policy and our Terms of Use. Close
fatslob-:O said:
Pemalite said:
megafenix said:

more poor excuses and bullshit from this suppodly tech guy

selecting 1024 bits over 8192 or even 4096 bits when xbox used the 4096 bits alost a decade ago


What? Are you talking memory bits? Or something more internal?

Because the origional Xbox had a 128bit memory bus with 6.4GB/s of bandwidth.

The Xbox 360 however had a 128bit memory bus with 22.4GB/s.
Where the Xbox 360 deviates is with the eDRAM.
It has 256GB/s of bandwidth inside the eDRAM which is actually 1024bit@2ghz = 256GB/s.
However, that's not interconnect bandwidth to the GPU or system memory, the bandwidth between the eDRAM and the GPU is 32GB/s.
If you want wan't a fair comparison Sandy Bridge has an internal ring bus that's 436GB/s.
The Radeon 3850's Ring bus was also 1024 bit.
The Radeon 48xx series had a 2048bit internal hub bus.


So this is actually nothing new.
However when you start talking interconnect, then it's simply not going to happen, 4096bit busses would drive up PCB/package complexity exponentially.


Basically, no part of the Origional Xbox or Xbox 360 had a 4096bit bus, unless you know something I don't know from an architectural perspective?

Gee I wonder who's the poor excuse for a tech guy right now ? /sarcasm *rollseyes* 

I wonder if we can't take our leave now from these peas ... I mean people, pemalite ?  

@pemalite

Me and Megafenix said that couple of pages ago... You mostly said thing that I and Megafenix knew and used, thanks for the bolded part. That's new. :)

@fatslob-:O

You are full of excuses, avoidance, sidesteps and ignorance... You could not even answer the question about bandwidth... Bwahaha.

Is permalite your dad or brother, your boyfriend or your husband? Everytime you lose you call him... Are you crying or something?

fatslob-:O said:
megafenix said:
fatslob-:O said:
AgentZorn said:
fatsob, are you interested in getting a Wii U? You seem to be very interested.

No sir, I'm only interested in knowing about it's hardware sir. LOL

Once the games come I'll eventually pick it up and enjoy it unlike others here arguing something pointless. 


like wii u edram being only 70gb/s which suggests an edram of 2048bits despite renesas doesnt support it?

saying things like there is little use for edram since its onlyu 32 megabytes despite eyeofcore schooling you, no sorry, i mean, shinen schooling you?

choosing 1024 bits despìte gamecube was 512 bits more than a decade ago?

choosing rthe worst edram configuration instead of the best or at least th middle one of 4096 bits despite renesdas saying that wii u use the best of the best?

 

talk about pointless

8192 bits

LOL You know that these corporations don't care about you. Quit defending the WII Us specs and start excepting reality. Nintendo obviously cheeped out on the WII U hardware as a whole. Just deal with it. 

Why don't you deal with it that we don't care about that corporation and you can shove that up your ass then deal with it that we are not defending the Wii U specs because the specs are not known while you just state rumors/speculation as facts so you are the prick that does not accepting the reality. Me and Megafenix are doing a freaking reality check on you yet you are in denial and so what if it cheaped out on that or that, Nintendo is not the only one. I will allow you to think that Nintendo is the only one that cheaped out, live in a fairy tale.

You should dealt with it that me and Megafenix tried explain to you that you are full of shit in a polite way.

You don't read, you can't comprehend, you stalk people, you don't give evidence, you try to dismiss our evidence with pathetic arguments that are not valid then you spread Fear Uncertainity Doubt and when you get pwned then you call your dad/brother/boyfriend/husband(Pemalite).

You are pathetic... Ignorant a**hole of a person.

 

Moderated - Kresnik.