nintendo_fanboy said:
Oh dear god and I thought we had finished this here... Now I see you actually dared to come back after about five people have told you to stop... Alright, I'll also do these arguments you bring here: 1) It really gets funny now, because it seems to me that you haven't played at least half of the games I mentioned, yet you are judging them. But let's talk every game seperately. Wii Sports: You're really showing that your approach is completely wrong here. You say that the minigames can be "finished" in about half an hour. How do you finish Wii Sports? There is nothing to finish in this game, and that is why reviewers can't judge it properly. It's like Tetris, and I don't think you can argue that Tetris is a bad game, can you? Mario Party: I think the concept of this game is not less fresh than that of FPS, yet they are scored way higher. As I said, I haven't played it, so I can't talk about those unfair things, but I guess you haven't played it either. And you have to list the points that are wrong with it, simply saying it has the same flaws as Wii Sports is very cheap. The others: List the points so I can prove you wrong. Wario Ware: Funny that I said here that I could understand a lower rating, but you say different just because you believe in your review scores. It is a funny game, but there are quite some things it does wrong.
3) Graphics have to be worse, that's why you pay less for the Wii. That is no point in scoring. The controls were praised by a lot and are said to be better than with a controller, though fiddy. Online is just no reason to lower a score, it is like saying Mario Galaxy should have a lower score because it has no multiplayer.
4) The combined sales of 360/PS3/PC will always be higher, but if you take the PC away, it will change soon. Also, most sold PC's are not used for gaming. The attach ratio may be a bit lower especially because the best selling console usually has the lowest attach rate, but absolute sales will soon be higher anyway. And developers don't enjoy making dumbed down games? Common, that's silly. Do you really believe the people at EAD Tokio had no fun creating Galaxy?
Case Closed. |
If you keep on posting i'm going to keep on proving you wrong.
1). I've played most of the games you mentioned. Wii sports is little more than a tech demo. For decades the good sports games come with a full seasons worth of content mirroring the sport it is based on, many different options for playing the game, leaderboards and online. Wii sports is just the equivilant of an exibition match which is all you get from the tiny demo versions of real games. Warhawk didn't score any higher because it had no single player game, with a single player game it would have scored 85-50% instead of the 80% it did. Poor graphics wether you like it or not make the game worse. Does a film shot with a bad camera or a film watched on a bad screen make the acting or the script any worse? No it doesn't, but overall bad camera work or watching a film on a bad screen still makes the overall experence worse just like having bad graphics does. Most of wii sports games are broken and can be exploited. For example wii tennis, when you serve you can perform a super serve by flicking your wrist quickly instead of performing a real serve like you would in real life. The super serve beats the a.i. 80-90% of the time and against humans they miss most of the time and if they do return it, it will only come back as a miss hit shot and then with your follow up you just smash it past them. In wii bowling just press the d pad once to the right if your right handed or once to the left if your left handed then swing straight and as hard as you can and you'll get a strike most of the time and the rest of the time you'll get a spare. In wii boxing all you have to do is flail around like a mad man and you'll win. Also you can't use your created mii's in wii boxing.
Mario party is a stale series. You can't compare it to an fps saying all fps's are stale because fps's have different stories, are set in varied locations and time periods, feature different weapons, different special abilites, fps's are generally technically impressive and they mostly have a decent online compontent that keeps them fresh. Apart from mario party being stale the whole game is made pointless by the random taking away and awarding of stars which makes the game broken.
3). When the other versions of tiger woods have better graphics and online then why should the wii version score the same? A different take on the controls which are fun but fiddly and also have a few gltiches doesn't make up the difference.
4). Even without the pc the combined sales of the 360 and ps3 are higher than the wii. The wii might be able to out sell the 360 and ps3 combined but it's a fact that wii owners buy the least amount of third party games so third parties still won't stop puting most of their aaa games on the360/ps3/pc combo. Galaxy isn't a dumbed down game, wii play is, given the choice to work on the new bioshock or the new wii play what do you think developers will choose.