| GotchayeA said: It's pretty easy to come up with some plausible explanations for those, though I'm not a biologist and I'm sure that one could do a much better job. Some fish found it useful to jump out of the water at times, or to stay in places where they could be trapped when the tide went out. It's not a big jump from gills to gills that work when very wet to gills that work when somewhat less wet, etc. Each stage would be able to survive longer and longer periods of incomplete submergence. Alternately, perhaps the lung arose from something entirely different - many fish have gas bladders that can be filled with air to increase/decrease their density.... |
The problem with what we know today is "Information" . For example we know that living chickens don't have teeth but they seem to have genes for them .Also chickens seem to have genes for both scales and feathers.
So even creationists believes in evolution , that is it's very possible for a scaled chicken can changed into a feathered one in a distance past just as easy as a caterpillar changes into a butterfly. ID of course believes in evolution.
The difference is a creationist and most ID sees the need of information (thus an intelligence) while Darwinist have to believe that large amounts of information can form randomly given enough time. Thus you have a "top- bottom" world view vs a "bottom-top" view.
