By using this site, you agree to our Privacy Policy and our Terms of Use. Close
kirby007 said:
allblue said:
kirby007 said:
DonFerrari said:
dahuman said:

this game being a simulator revolves around handling and control and ai is being judged on graphical facts like aa

same like putting civ:rev up there =total nonsense, it looking nice is a benefit not the goal

The point is, forza was touted as having next generation look and feel, xbox fans keeps gloating about how it blows the competition out of the water on visuals etc. Supposedly, it showcases what x1 is capable of, 1080p 60fps and next generation visuals, then comes the deep downgrade from what was promised at E3.

I don't see what's so "ambitious" about a console that has been constantly downgrading on its intial promises. Give me an honest take why that keeps happening.  

sono aa means its terrible which is frankly bs, handling, ai is next gen i fail to see your point

Yes of course, gunplay, recoil, hit registeration etc all that's important in a shooting game, we should have just sticked with battlefield 2, DICE should stop upgrading its engines seriously.

I'm sorry, in my standards, a next generation console should be capable of all the gameplay feats plus all the grahpical updates you would expect from the "most ambitious console" ever.

Keep dodging my question and hope I'll stop asking but I won't, here: "Why was there such a deep downgrade from what was shown and promised at E3?"

Highlighted so that you can better interpret the question. 



Intel core i7 930 OC @ 4.0 ghz

XFX Double dissipation Radeon HD 7950 356 bit 3gb GDDR5 OC @ 1150 MHz core + 1575 x 4 memory

Triple channel DDR 3 12gb RAM 1600 MHz