timmah on 07 March 2008
If macroevolution is true, why did all the 'intermediary' species die, leaving definite divides between species?? Why are there no intermediaries still alive? If macroevolution is constantly happening, there would HAVE to be species that are still evolving into other species, and thus there should be living intermediary species.
I'm not arguing that changes don't happen on the microevolutionary scale, but the clear divide between species is a tough hurdle for the die hard MACROevolutionists to overcome.
