DonFerrari on 23 November 2013
| Mummelmann said: OP: Have you considered that most people who bought HD consoles did it because they enjoy the gameplay of those games? A lot of games with impressive visuals, tech-wise, have fantastic gameplay as well. This whole polarizing position of "gameplay vs. graphics" is unfair, unbalanced and flat out wrong. I have played a lot of games with shitty visuals and shitty gameplay, I have played a lot of games with shitty visuals and amazing gameplay, I have played a lot of games with amazing visuals and amazing gameplay and I have played a lot of games with amazing visuals and shitty gameplay. This whole "Nintendo own the concept of good gameplay" kind of reminds me of religious people claiming that one cannot have a proper, functioning moral code without being religious. |
The pope won't like your remark... the previous one said that just people without faith got AIDS.
duduspace11 "Well, since we are estimating costs, Pokemon Red/Blue did cost Nintendo about $50m to make back in 1996"
http://gamrconnect.vgchartz.com/post.php?id=8808363
Mr Puggsly: "Hehe, I said good profit. You said big profit. Frankly, not losing money is what I meant by good. Don't get hung up on semantics"
http://gamrconnect.vgchartz.com/post.php?id=9008994
Azzanation: "PS5 wouldn't sold out at launch without scalpers."
