Mr Khan said:
Soundwave and I have been on the same wavelength about what the ideal solution is: Google partnership, hybrid console-handheld that can work like Chrome TV, being a console when you want it to be and handheld when you need it to be. Mobile graphics tech is accelerating such that they could easily match or slightly best PS4 when it's time to retire 3DS and Wii U in 2017 or so. Google partnership allows them to get an OS that the everyman knows, and Google won't care about hardware so Nintendo gets the hardware control they've always demanded, thus it can be a full-scale android device without undermining Nintendo's creative control, allows them to retreat from the console space without actually surrendering anything, and keeps them running as a handheld, and Nintendo's software teams will no longer have to be divided, since it's all for one purpose. |
umm..
ps4 level tech shunk down to the size appropriate for a handheld will, even in 2017, be quite expensive. doable i'm sure but still in the $300+ range which is quite a lot for a handheld. the vita at $250 was sold at a loss at launch and still didn't quite match the ps3 specs. so either nintendo will have to have the most compelling game ever created OR support other stuff: phone calls, google's app store, GPS, MP3, camera, and all the other that is standard and will be standard in a smartphone device by 2017.
if they support all that other stuff then it could be a really cool device. ..but nintendo doesn't seem too willing to split their focus on all that extra stuff. i think that would be quite a shift in their thinking that i'm just not so sure nintendo has the kind of leadership willing to make that kind of an adjustment.
a cool idea that i would be willing to take a sizable bet doesn't happen.