I think user metacritic scores are a good way to complement the regular pro scores.
I even think that they are more in phase with real gamers review and not professionnals reviews.
3/10 for COD for instance compared to the almost 8/10 pro reviews?
6/10 for BF4 compared to the 87/100 pro reviews?
6/10 for the annual FIFA release compared to 88/100 pro reviews?
Don't you think those users score are more in phase with your personnal opinion?
I think it reflects better the gamers reviews I see here and elsewhere on Internet than the pro-reviews because of the bigger number of scores. And user score trolls are on both sides. Pro and anti.
The 5 best AAA PS4/X1 best users metacritic games are:
Trine 2 8.2/10
AC4 8/10 7.6/10 (X1)
Injustice 7.9/10
Resogun 7.8/10
Killzone 7.5/10
By the way the users scores of exclusive X1 games are awful, here the best ones:
Powerstar golf 6.1/10
Killer instinct 5.5/10
Ryse 5.4/10 (repetitive QTE same stuff)
DR3 5.1/10 (technically shit, same zombie stuff)
Forza 5.1/10 (low content DLC bullshit)
Compared to PS4 exclusive:
Resogun 7.8
KZSF 7.5
flower 7.4
Warframe 7.3
Finally retrospectively, the PS4 exclusive really shine. Even Killzone.







