DevilRising on 22 November 2013
| yvanjean said: yes, because Nintendoland wasn't revolutionary and the WiiU should only cost $250 since it doesn't have next-gen graphic. But it's still not to late for Nintendo since they don't business the same way Sony and Microsoft does business. They can make game that are 100% more fun to play regardless of graphic, once these game hit the market they can recover market share. WiiU doesn't need to control the market.... But they do need a secure loyal customer base .... |
Saying it doesn't have "next gen graphics" is rather redudant considering it's hardware is literally capable of any fancy graphical effect the other systems can pull off. There seems to be a gross misunderstanding of just what Wii U's graphical power actually is, because you haven't seen it scratch the surface much yet. You saw a glimpse with Pikmin 3, and you're seeing some fanciness out of Mario 3D Land. But you have yet to see games like X and Zelda that will really push the hardware. But I suppose those won't look "next gen" either?
