Gballzack said:
|
First off, stop swearing like a pimple-faced prepubescent teenager whose best friend goes by the name "Angst".
Second, address my other points before moving on, please.
Third, your "GAME REVIEWS ARE NOT FACT! THEY ARE OPINION! YOU CANNOT USE OPINIONS TO PROVE THINGS! THE ONLY THING WE CAN PROVE IS HOW GOOD A GAME SOLD! AND IF THAT'S NOT USEFULL THEN DON'T ACT LIKE THERE IS ANY TRUTHFUL WAY OF KNOWING HOW GOOD A GAME IS!"
does not require CAPS, and "I merely pointed out GAme sales to show it was the closest thing we had to determining a Games Quality because Game Reviews prove nothing! And if something as worthless as Game Sales is all we have, then why bother acting like anything else is better?!"
Edit: You also said: "Whether those games are good or bad are matters of opinion and taste. There is no fact that one was any better than the other outside of what a few people can agree upon. The best estimate that can be given on a games objective value is its sales, whether we agree with that or not, its the closest thing we have." No. It's not.
is not a measure of a game's quality. At all. And I never once said or acted like there is any truth in game reviews or in game sales as a measure of a game's quality. It's YOU who brought these points up. All I said was that Metacritic does not in fact have any sort of pro_Sony bias like you so boldly claimed "literally", then retracted "figuratively".
If anything, you really need to brush up on your English reading comprehension skills. And your English writing skills while you're at it. After all, all these contradictions are just the result of your actually typing in such contradictions in the first place.
