By using this site, you agree to our Privacy Policy and our Terms of Use. Close
Mr Puggsly said:
adriane23 said:
Mr Puggsly said:
adriane23 said:
Wait, I thought a 73 on Metacritic was considered a "critical flop?"

I think they made a good effort with Killer Instinct, but I still don't think they made a legitimate fighter.

Please elaborate on what makes a legitimate fighter.

If the majority of the characters are pick-up-and-play fighters, it's not a legitimate fighter in my opinion. It's always been like that with the Killer Instinct series. It's main draw was that it was easy to pick up and play with just about any character. And my memory isn't too fuzzy because I played the original killer Instinct (for a lot longer than I thought I would) last Summer, because I was feeling nostalgic about the old SNES days.

I don't understand what you're saying. Pretty much all fighters are easy to pick up and play. You push buttons and attacks happen. Are you implying KI has no depth?

Please keep elaborating how KI isn't a legitimate fighter. You haven't made any valid points yet.

Let me rephrase it so you can understand it then. The majority of the characters in KI are for beginners. The KI gameplay system is even designed so that people don't really have to spend any time learning a character's move set (automatic combos). That for me, is not a legitimate fighter. Sorry if I offended you, but it is what it is.



I am the Playstation Avenger.