By using this site, you agree to our Privacy Policy and our Terms of Use. Close
globalisateur said:

Richard Leadbetter already warned us in a tweet that Ryse wasn't better looking that Killzone guys.

After watching the DF video, no one can sanely say Ryse is better technically than Killzone, it is not even anymore a contest, let me summarize to you:

- Most of the cinematics are not real time but movies. All the great cinematics which were supposed to equal KZ were in fact... pre-rendered movies.
- Framerates hovers at 28fps most of the time. Not even locked at 30fps by the way (saw 32fps) and go as low as 16fps. Often hovers at 26fps.
- 99% of play time is juddered as much as 1% time in COD Ghosts on PS4. If Polygon were scoring COD lower because of judder... they would have scored Ryse -198/10 and not 6/10
- 900p25fps Ryse VS 1080p50fps Killzone, KZ display 3 times the pixels of Ryse with big open worlds, and first view taxing perspective for 3D engine vs god of war 3D engine. Yes, 3 times you can re-count.

What a double disappointment (technical & scores) for the X1 most beautiful and hyped game! Seriousley Forza 5 at 1080p60fps is almost more technically impressive!

BTW the Eurogamer DF article has been shut down!! EDIT: article still there, probably my Internet connection

My god, it is like a roman tragedy in live!!