Gballzack said:
|
OK, let's take it from the top again, shall we?
Get back to me when you have edited all your posts from:
"Look at the list of sites Metacritic uses... They're all pro-Sony. Seriously, just look at the list."
to:
"Look at the list of sites Metacritic uses... Some of the sites are pro-Sony. Seriously, just look at the list. But gee whiz, there are actually some pro-Nintendo and pro-Microsoft sites listed as well."
And about this gem of a comment of yours:
"Face it, the closest thing you're going to ever get to an objective source is the game sales."
Get back to me when you have slightly better logic to fling around and don't suffer from "Spider-Man 3 Syndrome". I hear Extra-Medicated Ouendan can help alleviate the nasty symptoms you are suffering. (Oh, I am being figurative.)
And about this nugget of gold of a remark:
"How about you list all of Metacritics sources and lets see how unbiased they are then? And praise from sony owned websites doesn't matter much either I'm afraid."
I have. You have a gripe with fact? Seriously now...
Don't deviate from the topic. I just want honest answers from you on the above highlighted; namely how Metacritic sites are all pro-Sony, how the number of games sold is a measure of its quality, and how Metacritic is biased towards Sony. I don't want remarks like "I said it figuratively, not literally" because I unfortunately am not clairvoyant or have a degree in Nostradamusology to know when you are being figurative or literal.
I shouldn't have to be the one to look up the Rosetta stone to figure out that when you say this:
"Look at the list of sites Metacritic uses... They're all pro-Sony. Seriously, just look at the list."
You really meant to say this:
"I never claimed all of Metacritics sites were Sony based..."
Because, you know, those two phrases that you typed directly contradict each other. Do you perhaps suffer from some kind of multiple personality disorder, bipolar disorder or other forms of schizophrenia that you don't even realize you have directly contradicted yourself in the very same thread?
Perhaps you can take a course in remedial English to improve on your semantics? Or perhaps simply buy Reader's Digest - I believe they still have that section called "It Pays to Improve Your Word Power" which might help your cause and allow you to understand the difference between relative and absolute terms. And I don't need to understand the definition of trolling - I've got you as a perfect example
Get back to me when you actually have something objective to say regarding the above.
