Metacritic score is low because most of the reviewers are utter morons and reviewed this primarily multiplayer game on the basis of a single player campaign only. Interesting that they did not do the same for Battlefield or COD both of which have boring campaigns but were scored on the basis of a 'multiplayer' game. If you want to judge this game on metacritic score then no offence but your opinion does not count much as you have no idea how this game is until you have invested time in multiplayer.
I have earned over 250 challenges in multiplayer so far and spent upwards of 30 hours on the game already (I did not touch the campaign, don't care) and this game is fantastic. Also look at the user critics on Metacritic and Amazon and you see a much higher score. For all the guys saying they loved KZ2, the multiplayer in KZ:SF is actually much more similar to KZ2 then KZ3. It is a unique experience different from both COD and BF.
The Killzone franchise enjoys a small but loyal community which just increased in size with KZ:SF.
This means Killzone franchises appear within the top 5 FPS games in the industry.
It also means that as people burn out of COD there is a high chance of them starting to play Killzone
How is that a small achievement? They sell enough to make a profit anyway.
It is better to die on one's feet
then live on one's knees
