nitekrawler1285 said:
JerCotter7 said:
nitekrawler1285 said:
Nice that it can win such an award without being released or having any notable software that uses it. |
What's the point in this post? Even if no software ever used kinect there is no denying that it is very good tech. It would be better as a standalone but that's not what this thread is about.
|
My point is that I don't much agree with the decision in the article. I recall Microsoft releasing a simlar device a few years ago that was capable of doing all of those same things and I have yet to see it do anything revolutionary or drastically change anything. I suppose it's "very good" tech if you consider high resolution web cameras and ir projectors as very good tech and revolutionary but I don't. (if it were still 2010 I might even give you that the combination was a bit innovative)
|
You havent seen what hospitals and universities are doing with Kinect 1? Kinect 2.0 is revolutionary for those people.
