Do you agree with the way people approach metacritic on Killzone and Killer Instinct

[DD_Bwest]

TheEspionage said:

DD_Bwest said:
Killzone no..

No one here can make a comment on KI cause no one has played the released copy

I'm more so asking about the approach people are having on the scores rather than the content of the reviews.  Critics seem to love both of these games but are criticizing certain elements of the game which is dropping the scores.  A lot of people wont read or watch the reviews which is my concern.  Instead they just look at the scores.

sometimes those games are worthy of a score reduction because of those problems,  some times they are not,  It depends on the player.  So its really hard to tell until a larger percentile has played it and reported in. 

For killzone i dont think it deserves the bad marks and i am loving the MP.   We cant really tell for KI because we havent played it.  i dont know if they have released exact details on whats behind the paywall and not(i dont follow xbox much), and we dont have a group of public opinion weighing in on how this effects the overall game.  The game might be awesome and make you want to buy a little here and there..   or it might ruin the whole thing.  

 

edit:  also, not sure on this but didnt they say something about KZ having free map packs later on?   are they going to have expansion packs aswell to purchase or is it all free?   Free future content would be seen much better than content you have to buy.