My problem is less the 10/10 (well a bit also) than the inconsistent and unfair reasons given for this 10/10.
A next-generation game is a game that hovers at 20fps (with frequent low at 15fps, just rewatch the 2 DF videos) at 720p? When KZ which is really a next generation game got a bad score and was just pretty for them, no more.
When almost every reviewers on the earth (even at Polygon) said KZ had impressive next gen graphics.
What bothers me is the lack of consistency in those kind of reviews. Same at Polygon who now aren't disturbed by permanent awfull framerate but a drop every 5 mn in COD (when some reviewers never noticed anything) on PS4 forced them to consider this 1080p version worse than even 700p blurry current gen. When all COD player are amazed by the increase of resolution in the game after the patch. Well I am sure COD players won't care about a drop in framerate every 5 minutes when the game auto-save and would prefer 1080p sharp graphics.
Too much unfair, biased opinion is too much, sorry I can't take it anymore. :(
At least Eurogamer are consistent, fair and in phase with the average score of these 2 games.
Existing User Log In
New User Registration
Register for a free account to gain full access to the VGChartz Network and join our thriving community.
