sc94597 said:
You're certainly not a fiscal libertarian/conservative if you promote the nationalization of the second largest service industry in the country. That's as socialist as it gets (the means of production is monopolized by government.) Anyway, there doesn't need to be taxation to harm people fiscally in this case, because an entire service industry will collapse. But taxes will increase because you'll have to pay off all of the private instititutions and making them public, that's not billions, but trillions of dollars that would have to be spent up front, unless you're promoting the theft of these institutions in addition to the mandate that no group shall provide healthcare but the government. I really don't understand how one can be a conservative in the modern American sense (which has strong roots in classical liberalism) and also promote the nationalization of any market. |
Financially, I am incredibly conservative but certainly have SOME liberal views relative to politics. I am all for the government providing healthcare. Just like I have nothing against gay marriage. That is why I would never be able to be elected as a Republican (nor do I vote Republican...or Democrat), haha...they would all say I'm not actually a Republican. But that is besides the point.
I also don't know if it would be necessary for the government to purchase every single hospital. The government provides a medicare system that (relatively) works pretty well. While I have a hard time with the government being the one to mandate pricing and whatnot...it is not necessary for them to own the companies.
I realize that ANY solution is going to have certain bad things for it. The reality is, however, that I feel a nationalized healthcare stands the best chance at being a good solution years down the road.
Money can't buy happiness. Just video games, which make me happy.