By using this site, you agree to our Privacy Policy and our Terms of Use. Close
S.T.A.G.E. said:
Aldro said:
S.T.A.G.E. said:
Aldro said:

 

It wasn't a ten, in retrospect the game was at best a nine on average an 8.5 in overall quality as a game.

I disagree. It touched me more than most games ever did. "Retrospect" to you perhaps. I stick by my opinion of the game and having played it >10 times (last time being a few weeks ago): I still adore it.

EDIT: I also prefer MGS2 over MGS3 for reference; I love the whole insane convoluted part of MGS. It's the reason I love the series :D


Im not arguing with the fact that the game touched you. Of course it did, it had an unneccesary amount of cinematics in it. Barely had any gameplay.


I don't know about that. It has less than MGS3 for sure but not less than say.. Journey, which I also adore.

Act 1 and 2 has a lot of gameplay
Act 3 as well even if it is just a tail mission with great atmosphere imo
Act 4 has it too but its mostly against droids the , and the setting is just <3
Act 5 was poor from a gameplay standpoint, but dat microwave and fist fight <3


And while the Drebin system is garbage, it still allows you to decide wether you want to go guns blazing or stealth if you so wish.

While the cutscene to gameplay ratio is high, saying MGS4 had "barely any gameplay" is really pushing it and you know it.

 

Anyway yeah, I think we prioritize differently. I found MGS3s gameplay to become a tad meh after a while and in retrospect: The eating/healing system could've been done better.

I still think both are masterpieces :P