By using this site, you agree to our Privacy Policy and our Terms of Use. Close
Frequency on 12 November 2013
Edit Thread
KylieDog said:
Frequency said:
KylieDog said:
Frequency said:
KylieDog said:
Frequency said:
because there never was a forced parity thing, people just make stuff up and run with it for hits/attention/arguments


http://www.eurogamer.net/articles/2011-08-24-why-microsoft-wont-publish-psn-firsts

+Google for older evidence.

This is regarding arcade/indie/etc content, and when they say parity, they say content, as in they wont publish titles that have exclusive content on psn.

parity on content is not parity on resolution of graphical capability.


Hence, google.  Not my job to educate you.


Clearly it was nobodys job to educate you either, your linked article is in reference to the xbox 360 and two years old, everything else since then has simply been a rumor.

Perhaps rethink your actions next time before you churn out outdated articles with no relation to a topic, then flippantly suggest "googling" when you are quite rightly called out about it.


YOU brought it up and claimed there was never a parity rule, so don't try talk about no relation to topic.  I proved you wrong with sample evidence, if you google back further you'll find more.  Don't get pissy because I called out your BS claim.

Yes, in realtion to the topic, which is about PS4 and Xbox One, specifically the rumor that microsoft were FORCING PARITY ON PS4 GAMES.
Or are we to drag up unrelated consoles and games for every single topic now? My "claim" was in direct relation to the topic, everything youve shown is not related to the xbox one or PS4.

Don't throw a fit because you jumped the gun.