S.T.A.G.E. said:
As for your response on them responding to who pays more. Hell yes, that is the truth and no matter what EA wins in that category because they've got a lot of games and MS needs them. Shows you just how deseperate MS is by how much they shell out. |
Man you don't need to convince me MS think of us as brainless wallets I know it... its incredible that MS and EA try draconian DRM and peolpe (MS supporters) infer that Sony surely tought the same (just cause........ all companies want your money greedly) just to safe face... and they even pretend to don't know the timeline of Sony revealing the PS4 and saying no DRM by them (that it would depend on each developer individually) with MS backlash, and conclude that then saw it and backpedaled.

duduspace11 "Well, since we are estimating costs, Pokemon Red/Blue did cost Nintendo about $50m to make back in 1996"
http://gamrconnect.vgchartz.com/post.php?id=8808363
Mr Puggsly: "Hehe, I said good profit. You said big profit. Frankly, not losing money is what I meant by good. Don't get hung up on semantics"
http://gamrconnect.vgchartz.com/post.php?id=9008994
Azzanation: "PS5 wouldn't sold out at launch without scalpers."







