I guess we can add dig and agenda to the list of terms you need help with. Nothing I said was an insult to GAF. In fact, I gave them credit. If you truly think calling NeoGAF out for their bias is a dig, then you're the one with an agenda. That would be like someone defending the integrity of Fox News and trying to say they are not biased.
My opinion on this being BS would be the same whether GAF agrees or not. In this case, they simply happen to agree. I really don't think I would have to explain why that's a big deal but apparently it needed to be said. Is it a situation of "being quick to agree" when it's something I like, or a simple case of a broken clock (GAF) being right twice a day? You're smart enough to understand, it really shouldn't require explanation. But for some reason you seem bitter about people pointing out GAF's bias. It's cute, really.







