selnor1983 said:
Firstly yes I see a difference between AC4. But that has noting to do with resolution. LOL. And yes I see a difference between PS4 and XBO so far. So far Ryse and Forza 5 to me look visually better than any PS4 game. I still miss your point as to what your comment has to do with resolution? My point still stands. |
The biggest difference between different AC4 games is resolution. The textures are also better, but not to a level that would make you see the difference if you didn't put them side by side. The resolution is the biggest gamechanger, especially on a big screen, as you see much less jaggies and everything is that much smoother. And that difference is easily noticeable between games in native 1080p and upscaled from 720p.
It's not that your point still stands. You're just still in denial. The difference is there, no matter how much you claim otherwise. It is there and you will see it. If you refuse to acknowledge it - your call. As I've said, you may not be aware of it, but it is still there and you do see it. The fact that you are not aware of the difference (when not put side by side) doesn't make one version look better and the other look worse. They don't become identical all of a sudden.
Anyway, this is really absurd to me. I mean, if XO was cheaper than PS4, it would be a legit argument that the difference isn't big enough to justify a higher price, but now that XO is significantly weaker, MS fans have to pretend that the difference isn't there at all. I feel kinda sorry for you guys.
Wii U is a GCN 2 - I called it months before the release!
My Vita to-buy list: The Walking Dead, Persona 4 Golden, Need for Speed: Most Wanted, TearAway, Ys: Memories of Celceta, Muramasa: The Demon Blade, History: Legends of War, FIFA 13, Final Fantasy HD X, X-2, Worms Revolution Extreme, The Amazing Spiderman, Batman: Arkham Origins Blackgate - too many no-gaemz :/
My consoles: PS2 Slim, PS3 Slim 320 GB, PSV 32 GB, Wii, DSi.







